The PhillyNORML Forums
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2013, 09:32:10 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
5276 Posts in 1498 Topics by 3186 Members
Latest Member: mwhiter
* Home Help Calendar Login Register
+  The PhillyNORML Forums
|-+  General NORML Discussions
| |-+  News Forum (Moderator: 1puffer)
| | |-+  Senate and Pot Brownies: Double Trouble - 8/2/10
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Senate and Pot Brownies: Double Trouble - 8/2/10  (Read 998 times)
Quietus
Cannabis Scholar
*****
Posts: 537



« on: August 02, 2010, 04:22:57 PM »

Quote
August 2, 2010 4:39 PM
Senate and Pot Brownies: Bill Could Double Trouble for Medical Marijuana Treats



(CBS) Medical marijuana users may not have the option of taking a spoonful of sugar with their medicine if a new Senate bill makes it through the House.

Last Thursday, the Senate passed a bill that would double the penalties for people who sell drug-infused sweets.

The bill has garnered support from unexpected quarters. Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), says that "those who say marijuana is medicine had better be prepared to market it as such - and not as candy."

Further, says St. Pierre, those who sell pot-infused brownies, cookies and other "medical edibles," or "medibles," have reason to be worried, because, in his opinion, the bill is written broadly enough to include them.

As written, the "Saving Kids From Dangerous Drug Act," introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, would increase penalties two-fold for those who make or sell marijuana that is:

combined with a candy product;
marketed or packaged to appear similar to a candy product; and
modified by flavoring or coloring the controlled substance with the intent to distribute, dispense, or sell the controlled substance to a person under 18 years of age."
Medical ediblesare a very significant part of the multi-billion dollar medical marijuana industry, says St.Pierre.

And some people cross the line, especially in advertising, he says.

Some alternative papers run ads for pot in four different ice-cream flavors.  "It has a child-like appeal," he says of one such ad. "I don't think that was the notion of people who put out this ad, but that's what it looks like."


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20012414-10391704.html
« Last Edit: August 03, 2010, 01:41:16 PM by Derek Rosenzweig » Logged
Quietus
Cannabis Scholar
*****
Posts: 537



« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2010, 04:28:52 PM »

Here's the bill.  Diane Feinstein, now where did I hear that name before?   blink

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-258

Quote
Jul 29, 2010: This bill passed in the Senate by Unanimous Consent. A record of each senator’s position was not kept.



Logged
jackcat
Cannabis Scholar
*****
Posts: 581


40 yrs of Cannabis Experience & Persecution


WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2010, 05:45:49 PM »

I certainly don't agree with Sen Feinstein, but I don't use the edibles anyway.  And if I did, I make my own home made.  And they wouldn't be packaged to look like M&Ms or Reese's Peanut Butter Cups like some of the commercial medibles are.  Just don't mess with my Mapo!!! joint peace
Logged

My two cents.  Smoke it if you got it!  The strong stuff!
Quietus
Cannabis Scholar
*****
Posts: 537



« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2010, 12:07:04 AM »

I certainly don't agree with Sen Feinstein, but I don't use the edibles anyway.  And if I did, I make my own home made.  And they wouldn't be packaged to look like M&Ms or Reese's Peanut Butter Cups like some of the commercial medibles are.  Just don't mess with my Mapo!!! joint peace


It's easy not to agree with Senator Feinstein.  She took Joe Biden's place as chairman of the senate anti-drug caucus.  She's on there with another powerful progressive,  Chuck Schumer.

http://drugcaucus.senate.gov/Newsite/about.html

As far as edibals are concerned, I might actually enjoy some marijuana laced sweedish fish or licorice.  I don't see it being the government's business to ban it.
Logged
LEGALIZE ME
Reform Advocate
*
Gender: Female
Posts: 4


THIS IS PROHIBITION AND I WON'T STAND FOR IT!


« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2010, 03:06:42 PM »

I certaintly agree!  THIS IS JUST PHOHIBITION AND I WON'T STAND FOR IT!


i want to see the day i can walk into a state store to purchase my ounce of the SAME GREAT STUFF ALL THE TIME!  NO B.S.!!!!

I don't undersand why people can't embrace the leaf as they have the grape.  farmer dave scher
Logged

Prohibition...goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes.  "A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded"  Abraham Lincoln  December, 1840
     
Derek Rosenzweig
Administrator
Cannabis Scholar
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 1224


Cannabem Liberemus - LEGALIZE!


WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2010, 09:27:24 AM »

Yea we're all pretty disappointed in Feinstein for this. Stupid people doing stupid things, hopefully it won't pass. Most we can really do is try and make sure Senators Specter and Casey vote against it.
Logged
Quietus
Cannabis Scholar
*****
Posts: 537



« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2010, 10:23:25 PM »

Yea we're all pretty disappointed in Feinstein for this. Stupid people doing stupid things, hopefully it won't pass. Most we can really do is try and make sure Senators Specter and Casey vote against it.

They already voted and it passed via unanimous consent.  Meaning the legislation was moved on a floor 'yea's and nay's' collective voice vote, without a vote recorded for each individual senator.  If you want to stop the bill, call your congressman fast!
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!